Saturday, February 23, 2008

Should SPOOFING be part of cyber-crime law?

First of all we must understand the concept of spoofing. In the context of network security, a spoofing attack is a situation in which one person or program successfully masquerades as another by falsifying data and thereby gaining an illegitimate advantage. Spoofing is of many kinds email spoofing, sms spoofing, ip spoofing etc.

The purpose of the spoofing this or phenomenon is to send an electronic message with false identifications to gain unauthorized information which can later be used for illegal purposes. This is the concept of spoofing.

Therefore spoofing may cause serious threats to individuals, organizations and even governments. Now there comes the question should spoofing be part of cyber crime law? Now we analyze this by considering what the cyber crime is?

Any person or organization trying to obtain any informtion through illegal ways that is a threat to national security, buisness security or even personal security. So in my opinion Spoofing is a crime even though IP-Spoofing is helpful to identify location of the culprit but it damages your personal property badly. Your personal details, documents can be accessed electronically.

Terms Of Services

Q1: Disadvantages of the information shared by the google??
Ans: It may leak your personal information.
Q2:According to Clause 11, Indemnification, you cannot sue Google for any use of the blog service.
Connecting this clause with the previous question, how might a service abuser benefit from such clause?
Ans:You agree to hold harmless and indemnify Google, and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, agents, and employees from and against any third-party claim arising from or in any way related to your use of the Service, including any liability or expense arising from all claims, losses, damages (actual and consequential), suits, judgments, litigation costs and attorneys' fees, of every kind and nature. In such a case, Google will provide you with written notice of such claim, suit or action.

Friday, February 22, 2008

REVIEW OF BOOK "THE FUTURE OF IDEAS"

Avis Guggenheim is a famos director and before making any movie you have to take care of certain copy right laws. If some scene is accidently match certain thing than you have to clear its copy rights and lawer has the important role in clearing all legal matters. It creats burden as well as cost. It burdens creative process. It stuks the society in many ways.
As the result of technological and cultural revolution but the central aspect is still confusing and creates a blind spot. This blindness effects creativity adversly and creates hurdles in creating something new. And the battle is between old and new. And the environment is designed to enable tje new is being to transformed to protect the old and every one defends the same regime to whom he\she belongs to. In future the service could be one way and the message could be user demanded precisely advertised. Consumers are the user of products like Apple have its consumers and they are not strictly internet users. The socialism shows its faith in government to allocate market resources but in capitalism market itsef regulates resources.
A resource is free if one can use it with the permission of anyone or the permision granted him neutrally.